Scrap
Follow scrap from the count to the evidence.
Review scrapped units alongside total output for the same product. Add your own cost assumptions only when the recorded comparison supports them.
Synthetic demonstration. Customer uploads and scans are not available in this public preview.
THE SUPPORTED COMPARISON
What the records can show
Eligible records support scrapped units and scrap rate within each work-center and product group. Scrap counts alone do not rank different products.
A positive recorded scrap quantity can support a conditional scenario using your supplied currency, cost per scrapped unit and recovery fraction. Missing assumptions leave the opportunity unpriced.
THE LIMITS OF THE ANSWER
What still needs confirmation
Recorded scrap is not proof that every rejected unit could have been recovered or that its full cost could be avoided. The financial scenario is conditional; it is not booked savings or a promise of recovery.
A scan may find no positive opportunity, or insufficient data for this comparison. Its conclusion applies to the eligible records and supported methods shown.
FROM EVIDENCE TO A NEXT CHECK
A useful next investigation
- Check how rejected, reworked and scrapped units were recorded, and confirm that scrap and total output cover the same product and period.
- Review the source records and process context, then identify which costs could actually be avoided before relying on a financial scenario.
START WITH THE QUESTION ON YOUR FLOOR